Decarbonisation came first.Demethanisation is next.

The first phase of the energy transition focused on carbon dioxide (COâ‚‚). The next will focus on methane (CHâ‚„), which accounts for nearly 30% of the rise in global temperatures since the Industrial Revolution and traps around 80 times more heat than COâ‚‚ over 20 years, tonne for tonne. As regulation tightens and markets begin to price methane, industry will need to measure and reduce its methane emissions with the rigour it has begun to apply to COâ‚‚.

Most COâ‚‚ comes from burning fossil fuels, and those emissions can be calculated with reasonable precision from the amount of fuel burned, because nearly all the carbon in the fuel ends up as COâ‚‚. Methane offers no such shortcut. It escapes unburned from oil and gas wells, pipelines and coal mines, and rises from landfill sites and livestock farms, often sporadically. Companies estimate these emissions using standard factors, but those estimates routinely miss leaks, so direct measurements provide additional evidence about the emissions that occur. Satellites, aircraft and ground sensors each capture a different slice of space and time, and their readings often disagree. Quantum Envelope brings these measurements together in a reconciled assessment of emissions, giving companies a sound basis for the emissions they are obliged to report to local and national authorities.

Source for the 30% figure, International Energy Agency, Global Methane Tracker 2026

The three major greenhouse gases, 1990 to 2025

10010511011512019901995200020052010201520202025Concentration, 1990 = 100Carbon dioxide +20%Nitrous oxide +10%Methane +13%1001051101151201990200020102020Concentration, 1990 = 100CO2 +20%N2O +10%CH4 +13%
Concentrations of the three major greenhouse gases, each indexed to its 1990 level. Source NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (CO2, CH4, N2O). 2025 values preliminary.

How methane is measured

SatellitesHundreds of kilometres upwide area, large releases onlyNot detectedAircraftA few kilometres upsite and area surveys310 kg per hourDronesTens of metres upindividual sites180 kg per hourFacility camerasMonitors on sitecontinuous or scheduledLeak seen, not sizedSensors at the sourceAt the valvepipe or tank95 kg per hour, one valveIllustrative readings of one emission, seen five ways.

Methane is now measured in many different ways. At individual sites across the energy system, ground based measurements and facility or site based monitoring record methane concentrations at high frequency. Drones and aircraft survey individual sites and wider areas, and satellites detect methane across much larger geographic regions.

These measurements also differ in timing and sensitivity. A ground based sensor may take frequent readings at one location but sees only the methane that drifts past it. Drone and aircraft surveys happen periodically. A satellite observes a given area only when it passes overhead, can be blinded by cloud, and detects only the larger releases.

The result is a patchwork of methane measurements, collected across different geographic scales, time periods and levels of uncertainty. Quantum Envelope applies the Methane Reconciliation Standard to the available evidence within a defined boundary, reconciling these measurements into a traceable assessment of emissions with a confidence range.

Oil and gas is our first market

Quantum Envelope is an early stage company, initially focused on the oil and gas industry. Oil and gas operations released around 78 million tonnes of methane in 2025, roughly half of all methane from the energy sector, according to the International Energy Agency. Much of it comes from identifiable facilities that satellites, aircraft and ground sensors can observe, and the Agency estimates that existing technologies could cut energy-sector methane by almost 70%.

The sector also has the most developed reporting framework and a global trade in liquefied natural gas that moves the same gas between producers, traders and importers who each need to rely on its methane figures. That combination of measurable sources, established reporting and contracts that increasingly turn on methane performance makes oil and gas the natural place to begin, before we extend the same reconciliation to coal, waste and agriculture.

Regulatory reporting of methane is also becoming more common around the world. The Oil and Gas Methane Partnership 2.0 (OGMP 2.0), the flagship methane reporting framework of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), asks companies to move beyond generic emission factors to measurement-based reporting, and at its highest level to reconcile their own inventories with independent site-level measurements. National and regional rules are building on it, with the European Union's Methane Regulation one example.

Source for emissions figures, International Energy Agency, Global Methane Tracker 2026

Aerial view of an LNG carrier berthed at a gas import terminal, with jetties, storage tanks and deep blue water

When oil and gas measurements disagree

A liquefied natural gas (LNG) importer needs to demonstrate the methane performance of its supply chain. A producer may want to understand why an independent observation differs from its reported inventory. A verifier may need to weigh several sources of evidence. A trader may need to understand the methane characteristics of an LNG cargo before committing to a deal.

Each party can hold credible data and still reach a different conclusion. Reconciliation gives them a common evidentiary basis, establishing how the observations relate to one another and making uncertainty explicit, so they can settle contracts, file reports and price risk on the same evidence.

Quantum Envelope does not add another measurement. It establishes what the available measurements mean together.

Illustrative example

A gas producer's methane emissions by source

SatelliteAircraftGroundInventoryReported

Swipe sideways to see the full figure

Reported[X] t
Independent estimates[Y] to [Z] t

How our reconciliation works

01

Define the scope

We define the scope of the assessment, including the supplier, asset, cargo or supply chain being assessed, the period covered and the intended use of the result.

02

Review the evidence

We review the available evidence. This may include producer-reported emissions, assessments from independent third-party providers, operator and asset data, satellite, aerial and ground-based measurements, measurement campaigns, production figures and existing monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) documentation. Where appropriate, we add relevant independent evidence.

03

Assess each source

We assess the geographic and temporal coverage of each source and the uncertainty associated with its measurements or reported figures.

04

Reconcile

We apply the Methane Reconciliation Standard to reconcile the evidence within the defined boundary, establishing what the available evidence supports.

05

Issue the record

The Methane Reconciliation Record sets out the evidence considered, the reported and independent figures, the reconciled assessment, its confidence range and any material limitations.

An independent record for the buyer

Gas importers, particularly in the European Union, increasingly receive methane information from producers, suppliers and independent third-party providers. Most of it is prepared for, or paid for by, the seller. Few parties have the role of bringing the available evidence together and assessing what it supports from the buyer's perspective.

Quantum Envelope provides that independent reconciliation. The Methane Reconciliation Record brings together the available evidence for the supply being assessed and sets out how the different measurements and reported figures relate to one another, identifying the evidence considered, the assessment boundary and period, the reconciled emissions assessment, its confidence range and any material limitations.

Quantum Envelope prepares each record using the Methane Reconciliation Standard, which The Airshed Foundation maintains independently. The Foundation is establishing the governance and accreditation framework against which this work will be checked.

For information about a Methane Reconciliation Record for your supply

SPEAK TO US
Quantum Envelope

Independent Methane Reconciliation Record

Under the Methane Reconciliation Standard, stewarded by The Airshed Foundation
Illustrative example
Gas importer[Importer name withheld]
Supply assessedLNG cargo, [month and year]
Production[Basin and producer withheld]
Import terminal[EU terminal]
Quantity[Rounded quantity] MMBtu
Reported intensity[X] g CHâ‚„ per MMBtu
Verification status
MRS 1Verified within uncertainty
MRS 2Provisionally verified
MRS 3Unresolved discrepancy
MRS 4Unverifiable with available data
MRS 5Rejected, methodological failure
Result for this record MRS 4, unverifiable with available dataConfidence Not known
Reported intensity implies[X] t CHâ‚„
QE provisional estimate[Y] t CHâ‚„
Difference[N] times higher
Reconciled estimateIssued where the evidence supports one
UncertaintyQuantified at the 95% confidence level, using GUM
Evidence recordIndependent observations, source data and the verification basis
Methodological basisMethane Reconciliation Standard, Section 5.6

Illustrative layout. All details are placeholders and identifying information is withheld. The record shows no proprietary calculations.

Who we work with

We start with oil and gas, where methane reporting is most developed and the commercial stakes are highest, before extending to coal, waste and agriculture.

Oil and gas producers

See where reported emissions differ from independent observations, asset by asset.

LNG importers and traders

Assess the methane evidence behind suppliers, contracts and cargoes.

Verifiers and regulators

See how different observations relate and where uncertainty remains.

Lenders and insurers

Judge the quality of the methane evidence behind the figures they rely on.

See what a reconciliation involves

Independent of the measurement source

Quantum Envelope produces none of the underlying methane measurements and depends on no single technology, so no source can shape how its own evidence is weighed.

The rules of reconciliation also sit outside the company. The Airshed Foundation, an independent body, maintains the Methane Reconciliation Standard, and Quantum Envelope applies it commercially.

Visit The Airshed Foundation

About Quantum Envelope

Ava Lawrence and Francesco D'Amico founded Quantum Envelope to build the reconciliation infrastructure that methane data requires as it moves into regulated and commercial markets. The company brings together atmospheric science, data analysis and regulatory expertise.

Arrange a Methane Reconciliation Record for your supply.

Tell us what you need to establish and what evidence you hold, and we will discuss what a Methane Reconciliation Record can do for your supply.

SPEAK TO UScontact@quantumenvelope.com